Broadcom’s Earnings Weren’t the Problem

Join over 4 million Americans who start their day with 1440 – your daily digest for unbiased, fact-centric news. From politics to sports, we cover it all by analyzing over 100 sources. Our concise, 5-minute read lands in your inbox each morning at no cost. Experience news without the noise; let 1440 help you make up your own mind. Sign up now and invite your friends and family to be part of the informed.

Join for free today!

Broadcom’s latest earnings report delivered exactly what a growth stock should: top- and bottom-line beats, strong guidance, expanding AI revenue, and an increase in shareholder return through a higher dividend. On the surface it should have been a relief rally. Instead, Broadcom’s shares sold off — at one point down double digits — sending a clear signal that markets want certainty, not just performance. Yet this reaction is exactly the kind of short-term volatility that obscures the longer-term narrative for one of the most consequential AI infrastructure plays in the market today.

This isn’t just another chip story. Broadcom’s positioning straddles two powerful forces: the ongoing shift to custom AI silicon, and the persistent need for high-margin infrastructure software. Combine those with a massive backlog of demand, real pricing power, and shareholder returns that have been both reliable and growing — and you have a company that may be misunderstood at an inflection point rather than at a crossroads.

Broadcom reported revenue of roughly $18.0 billion in the fourth quarter, beating expectations and showing a roughly 28 % year-over-year increase. Adjusted earnings per share exceeded consensus. Guidance for the current quarter was similarly above street forecasts, with revenue expected near $19.1 billion. Management also announced a dividend increase — the 15th consecutive annual raise.

Yet despite all of this, shares fell materially in after-hours trading. Why?

The culprit on the surface is margin pressure: Broadcom acknowledged that revenue from its AI segment, though rapidly growing, carries lower gross margins relative to its legacy businesses. As a result, overall margins are expected to compress modestly in the near term. Analysts and investors selling the stock boiled it down to one concern: higher growth at the expense of near-term profitability.

A straightforward reading of the numbers would normally be bullish. But today’s markets have a low tolerance for anything that potentially slows margin expansion — especially in AI-related hardware. Values that had run up more than 70 % year-to-date were vulnerable to a repricing when earnings didn’t deliver everything the market thought it was paying for.

Broadcom’s AI strategy is rooted in custom silicon and infrastructure. Its order backlog for AI-related products sits well into the tens of billions of dollars, with deliveries expected over the next year and a half. This is not demand that is “anticipated” — it is contracted and real, deriving from hyperscale cloud customers and other major enterprise players.

That distinction matters. In an environment where a broad swath of AI hardware names trade at multiples driven by potential, Broadcom’s backlog represents booked business. When CEOs can point to multi-year, multi-billion-dollar commitments from tier-one customers, the fear of cyclicality is replaced with a different risk profile: execution risk.

On the earnings call, management reiterated that AI semiconductor revenue is expected to double year-over-year, driven primarily by custom AI accelerators and networking silicon. That projection isn’t a wish — it’s guidance tied to customer commitments.

Gross margin compression makes for headlines, but it doesn’t always make for incorrect strategy. Broadcom’s AI and systems business naturally carries lower gross margins than its legacy semiconductor products. That is because systems and custom silicon often embed higher integration, software, and service components — the parts of the business with stickier revenue but softer immediate profitability.

The market’s fixation on shorter-term margin contraction misses the structural arc of this transition: higher recurring revenue, deeper ecosystem integration, and a move up the value chain. The eventual payoff for Broadcom isn’t found solely in gross margin percentages, it’s found in higher lifetime value from enterprise engagements that span silicon, software, and network components. In many ways, Broadcom is becoming more AWS-like and less commodity-like with each quarter.

This shift mirrors the very calculus that has elevated other tech giants over time: short-term profit tradeoffs for longer-term strategic positioning.

Did you know 1 in 3 pets will need emergency treatment this year? Pet insurance helps cover those unexpected vet bills, so you can focus on care—not cost. View Money’s list of the Best Pet Insurance plans and protect your furry family member today.

Protect your pet and wallet

One of the overlooked pillars of Broadcom’s bull case is the company’s capital allocation. The dividend increase reinforces a broader commitment to returning capital to shareholders — a dynamic rarely seen at this magnitude in the semiconductor world. Coupled with share repurchases and cash flow strength, Broadcom’s total shareholder yield is a differentiator in a sector known for reinvesting nearly all cash back into R&D or CapEx.

This discipline has two effects:

In an era where growth narratives can ebb and flow with macro headlines, having a reliable return of capital is a fundamental strength that many hardware peers lack.

Broadcom’s valuation is rich compared to history, and sentiment remains vulnerable because so much of its story is tied to the broader AI hardware narrative. When the AI trade stumbles — as it has in recent sessions with negative reactions across AI-linked names — Broadcom gets caught in the downdraft.

But unlike many pure AI bets that depend largely on future revenue expansions, Broadcom has actual revenue drivers right now — growing AI segments that contribute meaningful top line, diversification through infrastructure software (including VMware), and enterprise networking products that sell regardless of AI booms or busts.

In that sense, the sell-off isn’t a signal of fundamental decay — it’s a signal of valuation sensitivity combined with growth expectations priced for perfection.

That creates an asymmetry often attractive to disciplined investors: strong fundamentals at a time when short-term sentiment is weak.

Broadcom’s latest earnings performance stands as one of the clearest examples of how markets can misinterpret good news when expectations are impossibly high. The company beat revenue, earnings, and guidance. Its custom AI backlog sits in the tens of billions. It continues to grow dividends and return capital. Yet the stock sold off because margins are expected to compress slightly and because the broader AI narrative is under pressure.

This is a mistake of interpretation, not economics.

Broadcom is not failing its AI strategy — it is transitioning its business mix toward higher-value, more deeply integrated infrastructure solutions. Margin shifts are the byproduct of that evolution, not the obstacle.

Deep sellers reacted to noise.
Long-term holders will see this as a reset — not a reversal.

Because the company that can combine custom silicon, recurring software revenue, and disciplined capital return isn’t just benefiting from AI — it’s entrenching itself in the infrastructure of AI for the next decade.

And when the market finally steps back from its short-term margin obsession, Broadcom’s earnings power — not its day-to-day price action — will dictate true valuation.

—

Education, not investment advice.

Sources: